Study
shows big game hunters, not climate change, killed off sloths
Filed under Research, Archaeology, Environment, Sciences on Wednesday,
August 3, 2005.GAINESVILLE, Fla. Prehistoric big game hunters and
not the last ice age are the likely culprits in the extinction of giant
ground sloths and other North American great mammals such as mammoths,
mastodons and saber-toothed tigers, says a University of Florida researcher.
Determining whether the first
arrival of humans or the warm-up of the American continent at the end
of the last Ice Age was responsible for the demise of prehistoric sloths
has puzzled scientists because both events occurred at the same time,
about 11,000 years ago. But by using radiocarbon to date fossils from
Cuba and Hispaniola, where humans appeared later than on the North American
continent, long after the last Ice Age occurred, UF ornithologist David
Steadman was able to separate the two events.
He and his colleagues found
the last record of West Indian ground sloths coincided with the arrival
of humans 4,400 years ago. The results are published in a Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences paper this week.
If climate were the
major factor driving the extinction of ground sloths, you would expect
the extinctions to occur at about the same time on both the islands
and the continent since climate change is a global event, Steadman
said.
Gary Haynes, anthropology
professor at the University of Nevada, Reno, said Steadmans study
clearly shows that ground sloth extinctions in the New World didnt
happen after serious changes in climate or vegetation and that
the first appearance of humans must have been the decisive factor.
The fossil record shows the
people who arrived in North America were making sophisticated tools
out of stone, bone and ivory, Steadman said. These big-game hunters
had a traumatic effect on the animals living there, he said.
More than three-fourths of
the large species of mammals that roamed the North American landscape
became extinct within a few thousand years, which, besides ground sloths,
included mammoths, mastodons, saber-toothed tigers and giant bears,
Steadman said.
It was as dramatic
as the extinction of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, he said.
By understanding when, and
to some extent how, ground sloths became extinct, scientists may be
able to determine the biological potential of an area for restoration
if human contact could be eliminated, such as in a national forest,
a national park or an island, Steadman said.
Im not a Steven
Spielberg type in that I dont believe that DNA would bring these
things back, he said. But in lieu of Jurassic Park, I think
we can come up with sound ideas using the nearest living relatives.
For example, we might want to consider taking living tree sloths and
introducing them to protected forested areas on Cuba or Hispaniola.
While the largest of the
prehistoric ground sloths grew to the size of a modern elephant and
fed on bushes and the leaves of lower branches of trees, todays
only surviving descendants are several small tree sloths whose range
extends from southern Mexico to southern Brazil, he said.
Such an experiment might
be similar to the one that involved restoring bison, once native to
Florida, to Paynes Prairie Preserve State Park near Gainesville, Steadman
said. With the work were doing, especially on islands, to
reconstruct which kinds of plants and animals particularly birds
and mammals used to live there, we can open up possibilities
for restoring parts of these islands to something near their original
condition, he said.
The only reason the living
species of sloths survive is that they live high up in trees, where
their green-algae-colored fur camouflages them, Steadman said. God
save the sloth that comes down to the ground because usually somebody
is there to kill it, he said.
For the study, Steadman sent
samples from the large collection of ground sloth skeletons at the Florida
Museum of Natural History on the UF campus, to Paul Martin, a professor
emeritus of geosciences at the University of Arizona, for radiocarbon
dating.
Steadman said he was not
surprised to find that humans were more significant than changes in
climate because most species of plants and animals can adjust to changes
in temperature. However, the transition between the glacial and inter-glacial
period, which resulted in shifts in habitat and the ranges of plants,
may have made animal species more vulnerable than they otherwise would
have been, he said.
This is the first time
its been demonstrated for West Indian ground sloths, and West
Indian ground sloths are sort of the poster child of big extinct
West Indian mammals, he said. I think this will go a
long way to finally put to rest this whole idea that large extinct
animals from the West Indies died out in the Ice Age during the
Pleistocene Epoch.
Back
|