BBC programme summary
Who were the first people in North America? From where did they come?
How did they arrive? The prehistory of the Americas has been widely
studied. Over 70 years a consensus became so established that dissenters
felt uneasy challenging it. Yet in 2001, genetics, anthropology and
a few shards of flint combined to overturn the accepted facts and
to push back one of the greatest technological changes that the Americas
have ever seen by over five millennia.
The accepted version
of the first Americans starts with a flint spearhead unearthed at
Clovis, New Mexico, in 1933. Dated by the mammoth skeleton it lay
beside to 11,500 years ago (11.5kya), it was distinctive because
it had two faces, where flakes had been knapped away from a core
flint. The find sparked a wave of similar reports, all dating from
around the same period. There seemed to be nothing human before
Clovis. Whoever those incomers were around 9,500BC, they appeared
to have had a clean start. And the Clovis point was their icon -
across 48 states.
"The best way to
get beaten up, professionally, is to claim you have a pre-Clovis
site"
Michael Collins, University of Texas
An icon that was supremely effective: the introduction of the innovative
spearpoint coincided with a mass extinction of the continent's megafauna.
Not only the mammoth, but the giant armadillo, giant sloth and great
black bear all disappeared soon after the Clovis point - and the
hunters who used it - arrived on the scene.
But from where? With
temperatures much colder than today and substantial polar ice sheets,
sea levels were much lower. Asia and America were connected by a
land bridge where now there's the open water of the Bering Strait.
The traditional view of American prehistory was that Clovis people
travelled by land from Asia.
This version was so accepted
that few archaeologists even bothered to look for artefacts from
periods before 10,000BC. But when Jim Adavasio continued to dig
below the Clovis layer at his dig near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
he found blades and blade cores dating back to 16,000BC. His findings
were dismissed as erroneous; too astonishing to be credible. The
Clovis consensus had too many reputations behind it to evaporate
easily. Some archaeologists who backed Adavasio's conclusions with
other similar data were accused of making radiocarbon dating errors
or even of planting finds.
"The first migration
was 20,000 to 30,000 years ago"
Douglas Wallace, Emory University
Decisive evidence would have to come from an independent arena.
Douglas Wallace studies mitochondrial DNA, part of the human chromosomes
that is passed unchanged from mother to daughter. It only varies
when mistakes occur in the replication of the genetic code. Conveniently
for Wallace's work (piecing together a global history of migration
of native peoples) these mistakes crop up at a quite regular rate.
The technique has allowed Wallace to map the geographical ancestry
of all the Native American peoples back to Siberia and northeast
Asia.
The route of the Clovis
hypothesis was right. The date, however, was wrong - out by up to
20,000 years. Wallace's migration history showed waves of incomers.
The Clovis people were clearly not the first humans to set foot
across North America.
Dennis Stanford went
back to first principles to investigate Clovis afresh, looking at
tools from the period along the route Clovis was assumed to have
taken from Siberia via the Bering Strait to Alaska. The large bifaced
Clovis point was not in the archaeological record. Instead the tools
used microblades, numerous small flint flakes lined up along the
spear shaft to make its head.
Wallace's DNA work suggested
migration from Asia to America but the Clovis trail contradicted
it. Bruce Bradley stepped in to help solve this dichotomy, bringing
with him one particular skill: flintknapping and the ability to
read flint tools for their most intimate secrets.
He spotted the similarity
in production method between the Clovis point and tools made by
the Solutrean neolithic (Stone Age) culture in southwest France.
At this stage his idea was pure hypothesis, but could the first
Americans have been European?
The Solutreans were a
remarkably society, the most innovative and adaptive of the time.
They were among the first to discover the value of heat treating
flints to increase strength. Bradley was keen to discover if Solutrean
flintknapping styles matched Clovis techniques. A trawl through
the unattractive flint offcuts in the storerooms of a French museum
convinced him of the similarities, even though five thousand kilometres
lay between their territories.
The divide was more than
just distance; it crossed five thousand years as well. No matter
the similarities between the two cultures, the possibility of a
parallel technology developing by chance would have to be considered.
More evidence emerged from an archaeological dig in Cactus Hill,
Virginia. A bifaced flint point found there was dated to 16kya,
far older than Clovis. Even more startling was its style. To flintknapper
Bruce Bradley's eye, the Cactus Hill flint was a technological midpoint
between the French Solutrean style and the Clovis points dating
five millennia later. It seemed there is no great divide in time.
The Solutrean flint methods evolved into Clovis.
"[Stone Age] people
crossing the Atlantic would be perfectly normal from my [Eskimo]
perspective"
Ronald Brower, Inupiat Heritage Center, Barrow, Alaska
If time could be discounted, Bradley's critics pointed to an obstacle
that was hardly going to go away: crossing the Atlantic Ocean in
small open boats. How could Stone Age people have made such an epic
journey, especially when the Ice Age maximum would have filled the
Atlantic with icebergs.
Dennis Stanford returned
to his earlier hunch, looking for clues among the Arctic Eskimo
peoples. Despite the influx of modern technologies, he was heartened
to discover that traditional techniques endured. Clothing makers
in Barrow, Alaska, recognised some Solutrean bone needles he showed
them as typical of their own. The caribou skin clothing the Inuit
still choose to wear could equally have been made by people in 16,000BC.
And for Eskimo peoples the Arctic is not a desert - but a source
of plentiful sea food. If the Solutreans had the Clovis point it
would have made a formidable harpoon weapon to ensure a food supply.
Would modern Eskimo ever consider a five thousand kilometre journey
across the Atlantic?
The answer it seems is
yes - they have undertaken similar journeys many times.. Most encouraging
was the realisation that Inuit people today rely on traditional
boat building techniques. 'Unbreakable' plastic breaks in the unceasing
cold temperatures whereas boats of wood, sealskin and whale oil
are resilient and easily maintained. The same materials would have
been available to Solutrean boat builders. Even if the Stone Age
Europeans could make those boats, would it survive an Atlantic crossing?
"DNA lineage predominantly
found in Europe got to the Great Lakes, 14,000 to 15,000 years ago"
Douglas Wallace, Emory University
Stanford believes the boats' flimsiness is deceptive. With the Atlantic
full of ice floes it would be quite possible for paddlers in open
boats to travel along the edges, always having a safe place to haul
out upon if the weather turned in.
All this evidence was
still essentially circumstantial, making the Solutrean adventure
possible not proven. Douglas Wallace's DNA history bore fruit once
more. In the DNA profile of the Ichigua Native American tribe he
identified a lineage that was clearly European in origin, too old
to be due to genetic mixing since Columbus' discovery of the New
World. Instead it dated to Solutrean times. Wallace's genetic timelines
show the Ice Age prompted a number of migrations from Europe to
America. It looks highly likely that the Solutreans were one.
The impact of this new
prehistory on Native Americans could be grave. They usually consider
themselves to be Asian in origin; and to have been subjugated by
Europeans after 1492. If they too were partly Europeans, the dividing
lines would be instantly blurred. Dr Joallyn Archambault of the
American Indian Programme of the Smithsonian Institute offers a
positive interpretation, however. Venturing across huge bodies of
water, she says, is a clear demonstration of the courage and creativity
of the Native Americans' ancestors. Bruce Bradley agrees. He feels
his Solutrean Ice Age theory takes into consideration the abilities
of people to embrace new places, adding, "To ignore this possibility
ignores the humanity of people 20,000 years ago."
Back
|